CointabCointab
Product
Solutions
Popular reconciliations
PricingResources
Schedule guided setupLogin
Start free

Adyen Payment Gateway Charges Verification

Cointab helps finance teams verify Adyen payment gateway charges by comparing internal records with Adyen reports, rate cards, and settlement data. Instead of checking fees, taxes, and settlement amounts in spreadsheets, teams can map the required fields once, run reconciliation, and review matched and open items in a structured report.

This type of reconciliation is useful when you need to confirm whether Adyen charges were applied correctly, whether the net settlement matches expectations, and whether any deductions or remittances need follow-up. The workflow is reusable, so the same setup can be used for future periods without rebuilding the logic each time.

What Adyen charge verification covers

Adyen charge verification is more than checking a single fee line. Finance teams usually need to compare several related values across reports and working files.

Typical checks include:

  • Fee charged versus fee expected from the rate card
  • Tax charged versus the expected tax amount
  • Settlement amount versus the calculated net settlement
  • UTR or bank reference presence in the settlement flow
  • Settled versus not settled in the bank statement, where bank data is included

A common settlement formula is:

Settlement Amount = Total Amount - Fees - Tax

When the actual settlement does not match the expected amount, the discrepancy can be reviewed at transaction level instead of being buried inside a summary total.

Typical data sources used in the workflow

Cointab uses the Side A / Side B reconciliation model.

Side A: your records

Side A contains the records your business expects to be correct. For Adyen charge verification, this may include:

  • Internal sales report
  • Order or transaction report
  • ERP export
  • Settlement working file
  • Expected fee calculation or rate card logic
  • Refund or return support data, if needed

Side B: external records

Side B contains the records received from Adyen or from downstream financial systems. This may include:

  • Adyen payment report
  • Adyen settlement report
  • Fee and tax details
  • Bank statement, if settlement confirmation is required

Supporting data

Supporting data is optional, but it can improve accuracy and reduce manual preparation. Examples include:

  • Rate card file
  • Tax mapping file
  • Order metadata
  • Refund or cancellation data
  • Identifier mapping file

Supporting data is used to enrich or prepare records before reconciliation, not to reconcile them directly.

How Cointab handles Adyen reconciliation

The reconciliation workflow is designed for finance users who need control and auditability.

  1. Upload the required files for Side A and Side B.
  2. Map key fields such as date, amount, and transaction identifiers.
  3. Add supporting data if it is needed for calculations or lookups.
  4. Create derived columns when the expected fee, tax, or net amount needs to be calculated from existing fields.
  5. Run reconciliation manually or on a scheduled basis.
  6. Review matched, partially matched, unmatched, and skipped records.
  7. Download the Excel reconciliation report for review, audit, or follow-up.

If the reconciliation depends on business rules such as rate percentages, tax treatment, or net settlement logic, derived columns can help standardize the calculation before matching starts.

What the reconciliation report shows

Once the run is complete, finance teams can review transaction-level outcomes instead of only summary totals.

Fee correctly charged

The fee charged by Adyen matches the expected fee calculated from the configured logic or rate card.

Fee overcharged

The charged fee is higher than the expected fee, which may indicate a pricing issue, wrong setup, or a calculation difference that needs review.

Fee undercharged

The charged fee is lower than expected, which may point to a billing inconsistency or a missing charge.

Tax correctly charged

The tax value in the report matches the expected tax calculation.

Tax overcharged or undercharged

If the tax value differs from the expected amount, the record can be isolated for further review.

Settlement amount match

The settlement amount in Adyen data matches the expected net amount after fees and tax are removed.

Settlement amount mismatch

The settlement amount does not match the expected calculation, so the difference can be analyzed at transaction level.

Settlement UTR not present

The report shows which settlement entries are missing a UTR or similar bank reference.

Settled in bank account

Where bank statements are included, the UTR appears in both the settlement report and the bank statement.

Not settled in bank account

The UTR appears in the settlement report but is not found in the bank statement, which may indicate a timing issue, missing file, or unresolved transfer.

Why finance teams use Cointab for payment gateway charges verification

Cointab is built to reduce repetitive spreadsheet work while keeping the logic visible and reviewable.

Faster review of discrepancies

Instead of scanning every transaction manually, teams can focus on open items and exceptions.

Reusable setup for recurring periods

Once the Adyen reconciliation is configured, the same workflow can be reused for monthly, quarterly, or custom periods.

Better control over matching logic

Cointab supports structured matching across one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-one, and grouped comparisons, which is useful when settlement files do not align perfectly with internal records.

Manual match where needed

If the system cannot confidently match a transaction, users can manually match records and keep the decision auditable.

Missed file handling

If a report arrives late, it can be uploaded under the same reconciliation and the report can be refreshed instead of starting over.

Audit-ready reporting

Users can download Excel reports that show fully matched, partially matched, unmatched, and skipped records for internal review and follow-up.

When this reconciliation is especially useful

Adyen charge verification is common in teams that process high volumes of digital payments and need to close the books accurately.

It is especially useful when:

  • Fee structures vary by payment method or transaction type
  • Taxes need to be checked against expected calculations
  • Settlement deductions must be verified against internal working files
  • Bank confirmation is required for settlement tracking
  • The same review is repeated every month or settlement period

Keeping the workflow reusable

A major advantage of Cointab is that the reconciliation does not need to be recreated each time.

After the first setup, finance teams usually only need to:

  • Select the reconciliation
  • Choose the period
  • Upload the required files, or use automated file intake where configured
  • Run reconciliation
  • Review the report

This helps standardize the verification process across periods and reduces the risk of manual inconsistency.

FAQ

What files are usually needed for Adyen charge verification?

Most teams use an internal sales or transaction file on Side A and Adyen payment or settlement reports on Side B. A rate card or supporting tax file may also be included when fee and tax validation is required.

Can Cointab compare Adyen settlements with bank statements?

Yes. If you include bank statement data in the reconciliation, Cointab can help compare settlement entries with bank-side records and highlight records that are present on one side but not the other.

Can the same Adyen reconciliation be reused every month?

Yes. Once the workflow is configured, it can be reused for future periods, so teams do not need to rebuild the reconciliation each month.

What happens if a report is missing or arrives late?

The missed file can be uploaded under the same reconciliation and the report can be refreshed, which helps finance teams handle late-arriving partner files without restarting the full workflow.

Does Cointab only reconcile payment gateway fees?

No. Cointab is a flexible reconciliation platform that can also be used for bank reconciliation, settlement reconciliation, vendor reconciliation, customer reconciliation, and other finance workflows.

Trusted by finance teams handling recurring reconciliation

Cointab is used by finance and operations teams that reconcile high-volume, multi-source financial and operational data across sales, payments, marketplaces, banks, and partner reports.

  • Ixigo logo
  • Abhibus logo
  • Confirmtkt logo
  • Keventers logo
  • Lotus Herbals logo
  • The Belgian Waffle Co logo
  • PharmEasy logo
  • FormulaRX logo
  • Borosil logo
  • Croma logo
  • Checkers logo
  • Charleys logo
  • Ascott logo
  • FoxTale logo
  • Newtap logo
  • Vibgyor School logo
  • Gameskraft logo
  • Recode Studios logo
  • Bonkers Corner logo

Ready to automate your reconciliation?

Start with a popular reconciliation, build a custom workflow, or schedule a guided setup with the Cointab team.

Start freeSchedule guided setup
View live demo reports

Written by Cointab Team

Cointab builds reconciliation automation software for finance teams. The platform helps businesses match internal records with external reports, review exceptions, automate recurring data flows, and download audit-ready reconciliation reports.

CointabCointab

Reconciliation automation for finance teams. Match sales, payments, marketplaces, banks, and partner reports with reusable workflows and audit-ready reports.

Product

  • Reconciliation automation
  • Popular reconciliations
  • Data automation
  • Reconciliation reports
Explore product
Solutions
  • Payment gateway
  • Marketplace
  • Bank reconciliation
  • COD reconciliation
All solutions
Popular
  • Sales vs payment gateway
  • Amazon MTR vs disbursement
  • Flipkart sales vs settlement
  • Bank statement vs books
All templates

Resources

  • Blog
  • Guides
  • FAQs
Resources hub

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Schedule guided setup

© 2026 Cointab. All rights reserved.

Privacy policy·Terms of service