Ajio Fee Reconciliation with Cointab

Ajio fee reconciliation helps marketplace sellers verify whether commissions, deductions, and settlement charges align with expected rates. Cointab automates this review by comparing your internal records with Ajio-side reports, highlighting matched items, fee differences, and open transactions that need review.

Why Ajio fee reconciliation matters

For marketplace sellers, fee checking is not just a bookkeeping task. Ajio orders can carry multiple charges across commissions, service fees, and other adjustments, and the final settlement may not always be easy to verify manually.

When finance teams rely on Excel alone, the review process can become slow and repetitive. Large files are harder to audit, formulas can break, and exceptions often stay open longer than they should.

Cointab helps teams replace repeated spreadsheet checks with a structured reconciliation workflow. Users upload the required files, map fields once, run reconciliation, and review the output in a report that separates matched, partially matched, unmatched, and skipped records.

How Cointab handles Ajio fee verification

Cointab uses a Side A and Side B model for fee reconciliation.

Side A: your records

Side A contains the records your business expects to be correct. For Ajio fee reconciliation, this may include:

• Internal order report
• Sales or finance working file
• SKU master or item master
• Expected fee calculation file
• Internal settlement working

Side B: Ajio records

Side B contains the reports received from the marketplace or related external source. For Ajio fee verification, this may include:

• Ajio order report
• Ajio payment or settlement report
• Ajio fee or charge details
• Rate card or commission reference file
• Other supporting marketplace exports

Cointab lets teams map the required fields such as order ID, SKU, amount, date, and reference identifiers before running the reconciliation.

Reports and supporting data used in the workflow

Ajio fee reconciliation often needs more than one source file. Cointab supports multiple reports on each side, along with optional supporting data for enrichment and calculation.

Primary reports

• Order report: Used to identify the transaction and the expected business value
• Payment or settlement report: Used to compare the actual marketplace payout or charge
• Rate card: Used to calculate the expected fee structure
• SKU master: Used to bring in product-level attributes that affect fee logic

Supporting data

Supporting data is not reconciled directly. It is used to complete or prepare the main files before reconciliation.

Common examples include:

• Product master
• SKU mapping file
• Return report
• Marketplace reference data
• Internal fee calculation sheet
• Lookup files used for enrichment

This makes the workflow useful when one report needs extra columns before it can be compared accurately.

Structured matching for fee differences

Cointab's reconciliation engine applies structured matching logic first and then helps analyze the remaining open items.

The platform can identify:

• Fully matched transactions, where expected and actual fees align
• Partially matched transactions, where the related order is found but the amount differs
• Unmatched transactions, where a record exists on one side but not the other
• Skipped transactions, where a row could not be used because of missing or invalid data

This is especially useful for Ajio fee verification because sellers often need to understand whether a difference came from a rate variation, missing record, duplicate row, return, deduction, or settlement timing issue.

What teams review in the reconciliation report

After the run completes, finance teams can review the output in a report dashboard.

Typical checks include:

• Correctly charged fees
• Overcharged fees
• Undercharged fees
• Missing orders or missing settlement lines
• Reference mismatches between internal records and marketplace files
• Skipped records that need correction before rerunning

Users can filter the report, inspect transaction-level details, and download Excel reconciliation reports for internal review, audit support, or partner follow-up.

AI support for difficult open items

Ajio fee reconciliation can include edge cases that are not easy to match with simple rules alone. Cointab uses AI in a conservative, reviewable way to support finance teams without hiding the logic.

AI can help with:

• Creating derived columns using natural language
• Suggesting Excel-style formulas for fee logic or normalization
• Analyzing open transactions with incomplete references
• Identifying possible reasons for differences
• Supporting manual review where deterministic rules are not enough

If the evidence is not strong enough, the transaction remains open rather than being force-matched.

Manual match and missed file handling

Sometimes a marketplace file arrives late or a transaction needs human review. Cointab supports manual match for exceptions that the system and AI cannot confidently resolve.

If a file is missed, users can upload it later under the same reconciliation and refresh the report. This is useful for recurring marketplace workflows where settlements, credits, or adjustments may arrive after the initial run.

Reuse for monthly and recurring reconciliation

Once an Ajio fee reconciliation is configured, it can be reused for future periods. Teams do not need to rebuild the workflow each month.

That means the same setup can be used for:

• Monthly fee review
• Quarterly finance review
• Period-end reconciliation
• Ongoing marketplace settlement checks

Cointab also supports recurring automation through email, SFTP, and API-based data flow where teams want reconciliation to run on a schedule.

Why marketplace finance teams use Cointab for Ajio fees

Ajio fee verification is a good fit for Cointab when teams want a repeatable, audit-friendly process instead of a one-time spreadsheet check.

With Cointab, finance teams can:

• Map fields once and reuse the setup
• Compare internal records with marketplace reports
• Separate matched, partially matched, unmatched, and skipped items
• Focus on exceptions instead of reviewing every row manually
• Keep reconciliation history available on the dashboard
• Produce reports that are easier to review during close or audit preparation

Frequently used Ajio reconciliation checks

Ajio fee reconciliation is often part of a broader marketplace control workflow. Teams may use the same reconciliation setup to review:

• Order value versus charged fee
• Settlement value versus expected payout
• Fee changes across periods
• Product-level fee differences through SKU mapping
• Returns or adjustments that affect the final amount

Because the process is built as a reusable workflow, the same reconciliation can support both routine review and exception analysis.

What the output gives finance teams

The reconciliation output helps teams quickly see what needs attention and what is already confirmed.

The report typically makes it easy to understand:

• Which transactions matched exactly
• Which orders were related but not fully aligned
• Which records were absent on one side
• Which rows were skipped and why
• Which items need manual follow-up or correction

This gives finance and marketplace operations teams a clearer control layer for Ajio fee management without relying on repetitive spreadsheet comparisons.